That is, because the template includes header.html, those tags should not be repeated in header.html. Also, although header.html is an HTML file, it does not contain the usual preamble of HTML tags such as or because those tags are defined by the template. For example, the JSP file listed in Example 2.b ultimately includes header.html, listed in Example 2.c.īecause header.html is included content, it does not have to be replicated among pages that display a header. If the format is modified, changes are restricted to the template.Īnother benefit of templates and including content in general is modular design. Websites containing multiple pages with identical formats have one template, such as the one listed in Example 2.a, and many JSP pages, such as Example 2.b, that use the template. In Example 2.b, for example, the title content - JSP Templates - is used for the window title. The template subsequently accesses the beans as described above.Ī direct attribute can be specified for template:put if direct is set to true, the content associated with the tag is not included by template:get, but is printed directly to the implicit out variable. Each put tag stores a bean in request scope and the insert end tag includes the template. The insert start tag specifies the template to be included, in this case the template listed in Example 2.a. Example 2.b illustrates the use of the put and insert tags:Įxample 2.b. The template is included with template:insert. Template:put puts the beans in request scope that are subsequently retrieved by template:get. Subsequently, template:get includes header.html. For example, in the template listed in Example 2.a, template:get obtains a URI - header.html - from a bean named header in request scope. The bean contains the URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of a Web component that's included by template:get. Template:get retrieves a Java bean with the specified name from request scope. The template:get tag accesses parameterized content, as illustrated in Example 2.a, which produces Webpages with the format shown in Figure 1.Įxample 2.a is nearly identical to Example 1, except we use template:get instead of the include directive. The templates discussed in this article are implemented with a set of custom tags: template:get, template:put, and template:insert. Templates are JSP files that include parameterized content. To minimize the impact of layout changes, we need a mechanism for including layout in addition to content that way, both layout and content can vary without modifying files that use them. If a Website has multiple pages with identical formats, which is common, even simple layout changes require modifications to all of the pages. However, because layout is hard coded, layout changes require modifications to the page. In the example listed above, content is included with the JSP include directive, which allows the content of the page to vary - by changing the included files - without modifying the page itself. The layout of the page shown in Figure 1 is implemented with HTML table tags:Įxample 1.
#About dreamweaver templates code#
JSP does not provide direct support for encapsulating layout, so Webpages with identical formats usually replicate layout code for example, Figure 1 shows a Webpage containing header, footer, sidebar, and main content sections. In fact, layout managers demonstrate an example of one of the tenets of object-oriented design: encapsulate the concept that varies, which is also a fundamental theme for many design patterns. This article explores a template mechanism for JavaServer Pages (JSP) that, like layout managers, encapsulates layout so it can be reused instead of replicated.īecause layout undergoes many changes over the course of development, it's important to encapsulate that functionality so it can be modified with minimal impact to the rest of the application. For example, traditional GUI toolkits provide layout managers, in one form or another, that allow layout algorithms to be encapsulated and reused. Although Web development tools are rapidly progressing, they still lag behind most graphical user interface (GUI) toolkits such as Swing or VisualWorks Smalltalk.
0 kommentar(er)
